Article-detailsAdvances in Industrial Engineering and Management
 Article-details | AIEM

2017(Volume 6)
Vol. 6, No. 2 (2017)
Vol. 6, No. 1 (2017)
2016(Volume 5)
Vol. 5, No. 2 (2016)
Vol. 5, No. 1 (2016)
2015(Volume 4)
Vol. 4, No. 2 (2015)
Vol. 4, No. 1 (2015)
2014(Volume 3)
Vol.3, No.4 ( 2014 )
Vol.3, No.3 ( 2014 )
Vol.3, No.2 ( 2014 )
Vol.3, No.1 ( 2014 )
2013 ( Volume 2 )
Vol.2, No.2 ( 2013 )
Vol.2, No.1 ( 2013 )
2012 ( Volume 1 )
Vol. 1, No.1 ( 2012 )



ISSN:2222-7059 (Print);EISSN: 2222-7067 (Online)
Copyright © 2000- American Scientific Publishers. All Rights Reserved.

Title : A Framework of Set-based Concept Selection for Risk Control of Product Development
Author(s) : CAI Yan-ling1, ZHAI Yun-kai2
Author affiliation : 1Zhengzhou University, 2Henan Engineering Research Center for Digital Medicine
Corresponding author img Corresponding author at : Corresponding author img  

Product development (PD) projects are generally very risky because there are tremendous uncertain factors to handle. On the other hand, point-based product concept selection is always taken as the mainstream in PD practice to reduce resources consumption or expected lead time, which will inevitably introduce extra uncertainty into the PD process. This paper proposes a new framework of set-based concept selection in PD to improve the probability of project success. It suggests enhancing the decision robustness of product concept selection by allowing parallel evolvement of multiple alternatives, and the size of alternatives group will be re-determined at the next stage by assessing the overall quality of acquired product information at the current stage. The proposed method could provide PD team or manufacturers an optimal solution by balancing resources consumption and robustness of PD project success.

Key words:Concept Selection, Set-Based Concurrent Engineering, Robust Decision, Risk Control, Product Development

Cite it:
CAI Yan-ling, ZHAI Yun-kai, A Framework of Set-based Concept Selection for Risk Control of Product Development, Advances in Industrial Engineering and Management, Vol.3, No.1, 2014, pp.59-62, doi: 10.7508/AIEM-V3-N1-59-62.

Full Text : PDF(size: 376.89 kB, pp.59-62, Download times:590)

DOI : 10.7508/AIEM-V3-N1-59-62

[1] Krishnan V, Ulrich K.T. 2001, Product developpment decisions: a review of the literature. Management Science. pp: 1-21.
[2] Cooper R G, 1993, Winning at New Products. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
[3] Sobek II D K, Ward A C and Liker J K. 1999, Toyotas principles of set-based concurrent engineering. Sloan Management Review, (winter). pp: 67-83.
[4] Ulrich K T and Eppinger S D. 2011. Product Design and Development (5th edition), McGraw-Hill.
[5] Cai Y L, Nee A Y C and Lu W F. 2008. Platform differentiation plan for platform leverage across market niches. CIRP Annals – Manufacturing Technology, pp:141-144.
[6] Ullman D G. 2010. The Mechanical Design Process (4th edition), McGraw Hill.
[7] Ullman D G., 2006. Making Robust Decisions: Decision Management for Technical, Business, & Service Teams. Trafford Publishing, Bloomington.
[8] Wassenaar H J. and Chen W. 2003. An approach to decision-based design with discrete choice analysis for demand modeling. Journal of Mechanical Design. pp: 490-497.

Terms and Conditions   Privacy Policy  Copyright©2000- 2014 American Scientific Publishers. All Rights Reserved.